December 14, 2009

307 11 Street. Single detached dwelling.
Decision: As long as windows do not overlook into the adjacent neighbours this application can be supported. It does not exceed any ARP or LUB guidelines.

832 10 Street. Single detached dwelling.
Decision: Not supported. This is a single family dwelling following the building [...]

  • Share/Bookmark

November 16, 2009

1822 Broadview Road. Single detached dwelling.
Decision: Not supported. The historical style does not fit with the context of the neighbourhood. There is a striking contrast with the contemporary style. The side yards are outside guidelines. The rooflines do not meet ARP guidelines; nor does the massing and character of [...]

  • Share/Bookmark

October 26, 2009

411/415 16 Street. Two single family dwellings.
Decision:   Not supported.  These are the two bookend homes next to a middle one that was reviewed in July.  The front setback, height, massing, and design compatibility are all of concern.  In addition there are inconsistencies regarding the grading and how this will be addressed.

506 10 Street. Third party [...]

  • Share/Bookmark

October 5, 2009

301 14 Street. Change of use to chocolate store.
Decision:  Supported.  There is an existing parking deficiency in the building but this use will attract pedestrians and this use does not exacerbate the deficiency.

227 14 Street. Change of use to medical clinic.
Decision:  Supported.   Again there is an existing parking deficiency in this building but the use [...]

  • Share/Bookmark

September 14, 2009

736 5 Street. Addition to existing dwelling.
Decision:  Supported.  Meets ARP and LUB guidelines and there was no opposition from the neighbours.

720 1 Avenue. Addition to multi-residential development.
Decision:  Supported.  The key change to the existing apartment building is to the front balconies, which will be replaced with opaque glass.  Also changing the foot print slightly with [...]

  • Share/Bookmark

August 10, 2009

1641 Westmount Road. Single detached dwelling.
Decision:  Not supported.  This is the 5th new home on this stretch of land.  There is significant massing and the home does not address height compabitility, privacy, and lot coverage.  The home proposed is a full three storeys which has an impact on the adjacent bungalow.

1225 Gladstone Road. Duplex dwelling.
Decision:  [...]

  • Share/Bookmark